<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Solving the Most Complex Engineering Problems With Marc- An Interview with Dr. Ted Wertheimer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/solving-the-most-complex-engineering-problems-with-marc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/solving-the-most-complex-engineering-problems-with-marc/</link>
	<description>MSC Software Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.12</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Product Marketing		</title>
		<link>https://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/solving-the-most-complex-engineering-problems-with-marc/comment-page-1/#comment-399211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Product Marketing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/?p=5194#comment-399211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/solving-the-most-complex-engineering-problems-with-marc/comment-page-1/#comment-399071&quot;&gt;Bob&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Thank you for a great question! Ted would be happy to personally respond to you and learn about the specific problems you’re trying to solve. Please feel free to contact him directly at: &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:ted.wertheimer@mscsoftware.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ted.wertheimer@mscsoftware.com&lt;/a&gt; Generally speaking, Marc’s global adaptive meshing is the best in business. Marc’s contact capability is much better, as well. Methods based on explicit dynamics, are fundamentally incorrect for static behaviors - computational times will become very large or incorrect results are obtained. Please email Ted directly for more detailed discussion!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/solving-the-most-complex-engineering-problems-with-marc/comment-page-1/#comment-399071">Bob</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you for a great question! Ted would be happy to personally respond to you and learn about the specific problems you’re trying to solve. Please feel free to contact him directly at: <a href="mailto:ted.wertheimer@mscsoftware.com" rel="nofollow">ted.wertheimer@mscsoftware.com</a> Generally speaking, Marc’s global adaptive meshing is the best in business. Marc’s contact capability is much better, as well. Methods based on explicit dynamics, are fundamentally incorrect for static behaviors &#8211; computational times will become very large or incorrect results are obtained. Please email Ted directly for more detailed discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/solving-the-most-complex-engineering-problems-with-marc/comment-page-1/#comment-399071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simulatemore.mscsoftware.com/?p=5194#comment-399071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Dr. Wertheimer, 
Please let me know why should I invest in MSC.Marc instead of Abaqus? 
Any good points where MSC.Marc is better?
Bob]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. Wertheimer,<br />
Please let me know why should I invest in MSC.Marc instead of Abaqus?<br />
Any good points where MSC.Marc is better?<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
